How is crowdsourcing like a fried egg?

Crowdsourcing makes a lot of sense to me, but I'm curious about how it actually gets done.  Oddly, (eve to me), I found myself comparing it to a fried egg. (No, I didn't crowdsource that idea, but I could have!)

Crowdsourcing is like a fried egg because:

• There is a central "thing" that the crowdsourcing activity gathers around and supports.  In an egg, a primary purpose of the egg white is to nourish the developing embryo.  In crowdsourcing, the group responses supply information and/or ideas to the entity wishing to receive information.

• A fried egg has ill-defined edges and crowdsourcing has ill-defined access availability.  Depending on how you make a fried egg, the edges might make a nice round space, with the white equally distributed around the yolk.  However, probably not. Like a fried egg, social media-enabled crowdsourcing is likely to be more available to some than to others.  We have discussed the variations of the digital divide in class, and Dr. Dennen has raised our awareness of rural v. urban access.  There are geopolitical divides, as well.  Minority groups may be left out of the crowd being sources. Thus, the potential responders to crowdsourcing can be lop-sided.  Like a fried egg's egg white.

• A fried egg is pretty darn versatile.  Crownsourcing is as well, providing information for organizations from McDonald's to Greenpeace.  "Sentiment analysis" supports government's ability to know the mind of its citizenry, as well as collecting ideas, funds, tasks and data.  

In many ways, crowdsourcing is not not at all like a fried egg. It's not much like one of anything, as it take, literally, a "crowd" of data in order to reap the benefits of "the wisdom of crowds."


A better  comparison might be, if you un-fried the egg, and reconstructed it back into its shell,  Now, consider the evolutionary history of the egg.  A hen's egg is an excellent example of problem-solving, occuring after millenia of evolutionary pressure.

Social-media enabled crowdsourcing allows for the collection of data, analysis of large amounts of data, and resulting new or modified output, in a very very very small amount of time.

Is crowdsourcing like a fried egg?  Not really, don't be silly.  Is it like the forces of evolution?  I believe, much much more.

Sources
Five ways crowdsourcing serves our governments. Citizen lab.  Wiete van Ransbeek, March 24, 2016

9 Great Examples of Crowdsourcing in the Age of Empowered Consumers, Tweek Your Biz, July 10, 2015, updated September 22, 2018.

When crowdsourcing is a bad idea, Simon Thompson, July 9, 2012

From the ADHD Oscars: And the winner in supporting roles, goes to Diigo!

As I have disclosed several times, I had adult ADHD.  This impacts my interactions with social media in a few ways.   See below if you want the whole list.  For this post, only one trait is important  (and hard to self-disclose).  It is about reading.

I'm not a quick nor particularly effective reader.  I often have to stop and process information or re-read, since my attention slipped off the page.

I'm not an effective collector and curator of readings.I prefer to read on paper, but have a, kindly put, ideosyncratic filing system that I often can't remember, and I usually lose the document before I file it anyway.  And since I have printed it, I've lost the URL.  And this is one reason I think Diigo is gonna be my new best friend.

There are many time management, note taking and other organizational apps that are quite helpful for neuroatypicals. They are not social media, but what I think of as support players.  As they help with scheduling, focus and energy conservation they enable me to spend more productive time doing coursework.. in this case, exploring social media.

Regarding Diigo,

My first impression was to run away.  Diigo appears quite chaotic, at least to me, when there are many topics being presented at one time.  While I'm a great chaos generator (ask my husband!) chaotic environments are difficult for me.  

However, as I started to play around with Diigo and learned more how to control my posts, I can see how it will be a real advantage to me in organizing information.  Diigo's features that help everyone else will certainly help me, but the great thing is the ability to generate one's own tags.  Folksonomy is fun, and fun helps me stay on engaged and on track.  

Fun is, by the way, why almost all my posts are illustrated.  Finding the right image is fun, if occasionally gratuitious.

Will I use Diigo as a form of social media, as a collaborative knowledge builder?  I'm not sure.  I'd be self-conscious about sharing it, since it is going to be as messy as Diigo will allow, but since it is MY mess, I should be able to navigate through it.  

I'm sure I would also feel self-conscious about the paucity of notes I take per article. I understand my shorthand, but it won't look like much to others.

And, there are those tags.  My tags!  Don't want anyone messing with my tags!

So there you go.

In case you are interested...

My ADHD brain on social media

• I check out Twitter more than necesary if my impulse control is iffy, depending on if I'm a quart low on medication.
• Or, I forget to check my social media outlets for extended periods and my (fill in the blanks) think I have deserted them.  
• I am easily frustrated and not particularly resilient.  Hence my issues with Instagram.
• I get overwhelmed by visually crowded fields.  As much as I love infographics, a Pintrist page full of them, and I react like Bela Lugosi confronted with a crucifix.
• I'm an impulsive commentor.  Sometimes I comment when I don't have anything useful to say. (Although perhaps you welcome the dopamine jolt.  I dunno.)

You might say that these are traits ones that anybody could have, and you would be correct.  The problems come from the intensity these points manifest themselves, not that they exist.  So there.

Image by Mohmed Hassan on Pixabay

Caffine and Dopamine

Caffine and dopamine.  How I start my day.  I make coffee, and sit at the computer, checking in with my social media outlets. Why?  If I've been responded to, with likes,  hearts, views or comments, it feels good.

Caffine, no need to explain.  Dopamine, however, may warrent a word or two.

Dopamine is a neurotransitter, a chemical substance that causes certain nerves in the brain to fire.  These nerves are involved with a whole host of things, including movement (Parkinsons disease is essentially a disorder caused by lack of dopamine) and attention.

It is the brain chemical that seems most closely tied to computer gaming and social media.  Dopamine is important to the "reward structure" in the brain.  When something happens that pleases you, a jolt of dopamine hits your brain.  Bzzzzt!  Since dopamine leaves you happy (very simplistically put!) you are more likely to repeat the action that resulted in that dopamine jolt.

Social media seems to be riddled with opportunities for dopamine jolts.  A thumbs up on a Facebook post?  Bzzzzt!  Someone replies to a Twitter post?  Bzzzzt!  The stats show that someone's read you blog?  Bzzzzt! 

It's that last one that is looking especially interesting.  Recently, a study of infant-maternal bonding indicated that dopamine may play a role in human bonding.  If that is the case, perhaps the dopamine jolt one may get from having a blog reader comment on a post not only makes you feel good, but also predisposes you to bond with the individual that made the comment.  Bzzzzt!

Perhaps one factor in the development of social media communities is that, as we are responsed to, the release of dopamine not onlly gives us that bzzzzzt! of pleasure, but increases the likelihood that we will bond with the individual who has responded to us.

This is not to give human bonding a simplistic explanation, nor to indicate that dopamine is a simple "feel good" chemical (neither dopamine nor social relationships are so easily understood, mores the pity). This post is merely a bit of information on how, perhaps, the phenomeon of social media communities has come to be.

Reflection on pseudoidentity

When I was in high school, I kept a diary.  A pen and paper diary, that I kept hidden.  My little brother found it, and entertained his buddies by reading excerpts from it.  

Turns out that more than one woman I know has had a similar experience.  My neighbor, for instance.

We, like many, have concerns over privacy and are not entirely trustful with diaristic blogging. I have written before (see Think of your reputation, my dear)  that I do guard my personas, depending on what social media platform I am writing. 

Having recently finished Dr. Dennen's Constructing academic alter-egos: identiy issues in a blog-based community, I wonder how I might develop another identity, should I continue wandering through the blogosphere.

I might not use my own name, my last name being fairly identifyable.  And it would be fun to come up with a new one.  

I would definately change the graphic design of my template, but that is more a matter of familiarity with blogging template.  And I already have my Bitmoji avatar.

My voice and content?  Actually, both are more authentic in my blogs than in my face-to-face "office lady" life.  When I shake off the feeling that I should be writing miniature scholarly papers, my voice rings truer here than it often does face-to-face.  

I am fortunate that I could take on a pseudoidentity at a later time, but don't think I need to do so.  However, to quote Doris Day, "the future's not ours to see."*  There may come a time when I wish to blog beyond bounds of professional or even political seemliness.  If such a time comes, the norms of pseudoidentify in blog-based communities will have a comforting familiarity.

* The Man Who Knew Too Much, directed by Alfred Hitchcock, 1956.

Think of your reputation, my dear

While reading The Emerging Neuroscience of Social Media, I was struck by one sentence.

People use social media for two primary reasons: (i) to connect with others, and (ii) to manage the impression they make on others.

The first reason is interesting enough, but it was the second reason that floored me.  It had not crossed my mind that I used social media to, as Great-Great-Granny might have put it, manage my reputation.

I am bemused to find that I do.  

I will spare you the evolutionary benefits of putting out and maintaining one's reputation.  They revolve around the idea that the group aristocrat gets the goodies.  Rather, I will try to stick to the topic.

On Facebook, I take care to react to and share wry, witty content from various sites that I find to be sophisticated (and so guarding my reputation for quirky intelligence).  I gently ask for opinions and reasons from "friends" with differing political backgrounds - but rarely get answers, more is the pity. (Maintaining my self-described reputation as curious, analytical, questing for understanding, etc.)

On Linked In, I try to manage my reputation as someone who is a seasoned professional, with a broad range of positions, but also as someone who is hip to the modern world on learning technologies and would be interesting to work with.  Considering my age (hard to hide with my profile picture, I try to post au courant content, again trying to manage my reputation as well-versed in current learning technologies, theory, etc.

On Instagram, I was tempted to say I don't give a hoot for my reputation, and will post anything, but that isn't true.  I consider myself something of an artist, and absolutely would not post something that didn't please my own eye.  Heavens forbid I become known for spontaneity as opposed to reason.

On blogging, well, I'm somehow willing to let myself go and be a crank.  With one exception, I feel no fear of context collapse, and so find myself more willing to let go of the reputation I guard in other forms of social media.  With other forms of social media, the threat of context collapse is much more eminent.  I am connected to my family on Facebook, I may work with my connections on Linked In, and my next-door neighbor follows me on Instagram.  

I would be very interested in hearing from you about how, or if, you use social media to "manage the impression you make on others." 

PLEs: A tool for self-regulation in social communication?

A caveat:  This post is going to discuss an idea about coaching individuals with medical, social, psychological or whatever diagnoses.   I am not a professional in this area but, being a person with ADHD, I've picked up, through informal learning, some information on coaching.  

I'm also thinking while blogging - not something I'm comfortable with, but a phenomenon that has been pointed out as one function of blogging.   So... here goes.  No virtual rotten tomatoes please.

While reading Dabbah and Kirsantas description of a framework for supporting self-regulated learning in PLE's, the progression from Level 1, a personal, private online environment to Level 2, a socially open environment,  jumped out to me as a way of supporting social development in learners with what I'm calling "social impairment" for lack of a better term.

Learners with many different cognitive/intellectual deficits, such as autism, ADD/ADHD, Down's Syndrome, as well as social anxiety disorders, display problems in managing the social act of communication, the temporal aspects of speaking and listening, appropriate affect, balancing monopolizing a conversation, etc.

I wonder if allowing a learner who would benefit from learning/coaching in social communication would benefit from being guided and encouraged to move from a safe and private online environment, (Zimmerman's "forethought" phase) in which the learner prepares tools for communicating effectively, to a gradually more socially active, conversational, perhaps collaborative environment (Dabbagh and Kitsanta's level 2, Zimmerman's performance phase).  Would this be an effective opportunity for coaching?

This is what I'm wondering about now, the role of mirror neurons and social media

There are these wonderful little neurons, mirror neurons, that seem to convince bone and muscle tissue that it is acting, while the individual is merely observing an action.  Perhaps there is a variety of mirror neuron that would function similarly with Web 2.0 interactions.

Hmmmm.....

A few minutes later...

Bless Google's heart, there is a body of information on mirror neurons and social media.  

One nifty article is, Of Mirror Neurons and Social Media, which gives mirror neurons a place in social media.  Contrasting that is How Social Media Affects your Brain, which denies mirror neurons any place in interactions via social media.

A blog post for another day.

How Digital Media Helps Me Love My Job

That EME6414 Instagram challenge just about killed me.  

I was doing OK with Instagram, until I created a second page.  Sorrow and woe ensued.  There was some nonsense about taking a picture in one account, and sending it to another account, and where to put it, and if it came from a message.  

I tried looking for directions, but nothing seemed help.  Not even my next-door neighbor who told me she knew Instagram.  (More sorry and woe; now she is confused, too.)

The issue, I believe, is that I didn't know enough to define the problem, and so was thrashing around, randomly pressing and clicking and eventually making SOMETHING happen... Sometimes even the right thing, but... because it came from random thrashing, I couldn't remember what I had done.  

I was so distraught about what to do with the image that I just didn't take the </explicative> shot at all.

Linda Blair Head Spinning Dummy,
from the Exorcist

You may be familiar with Quality Matters (QM), a systematic method for evaluating online courses.  The QM rubric provides a detailed framework for scoring components of a course.  A seemingly nit-picky standard.  A standard that at times can make your head spin around 360 when you are putting together an online course.  


Case in point: A crucial set of points goes into explicitly making sure that your learner always knows exactly where to go and what to do.

"Surely," one might say, "all this is not necessary.  They are (fill in the blank) students; they can figure it out."  

You know what?  Sometimes, for one reason or another, they can't.  Perhaps its an off day.  Or the kid is sick and the learner is up too late.  Or the learner may have any number of neuroatypical glitches that require support.  (Like adult ADHD, like me! 👩)

More importantly, learners shouldn't have to expend energy figuring out where to go.  An individual's capacity for taking in information at a single point in time has limitations.  Would you prefer that a student get what might seem like an overly detailed course map and/or set of instructions, or to be spending energy wandering around lost in an online course.

So, I don't love Instagram quite yet, but my experience has left me happier to expend the energy in making sure learners don't have to wander in an online wilderness. 

Gotta love the unintended consequences of social media.